Wednesday, December 31, 7000

Permanent Top Post by JM Talboo and Steve W.



By JM Talboo and Steve W.

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2008/10/debunking-myths-on-conspiracy-theories.htmlMany people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth debunkers.

 

The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help.

“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States”
Former Sen. Bob Graham on 60-Minutes 




We might be wrong about where we suspect this all leads, but the "debunkers" are wrong when many essentially argue that it's acceptable for 70% of 9/11 family members questions to have never been answered by the 9/11 Commission. So of course, most have no qualms about promises made to 9/11 family members being broken by the Commission to investigate all whistleblower claims, which a substantial amount of the public find highly-suspicious at minimum, with many regarding the evidence as suggestive of complicity to varied degrees.

The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.


[On the left side (above) is a video of WTC 7 collapsing. On the right side is a video of a controlled demolition.]


So it stands to reason, that these ilk feel the lack of air defense story is above scrutiny to the point that secrecy and rewards are warranted. So what if this tale consists of 3, or some contend 4, mutually contradictory versions of events and admitted lies. It makes perfect sense that the top officials from NORAD and the FAA received promotions, as opposed to having to provide documents with data that would prove that the jet fighters were acceptably responsive, given the past response time averages.


Unsurprisingly, the duh-bunkturds hate even the best of the "Loose Change" films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

It is therefore the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth "debunkers" and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public. This site now features 9/11 truth related and not-so-related content. So please utilize our search feature (found also on the sidebar) to find a massive treasure trove of well-researched info on nearly every issue in the realm of 9/11 truth debate. 

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here. Ad hominems will be ignored, but well-formed rebuttals may be addressed (and that is a subjective matter) provided we have not refuted the points therein numerous times on this blog already.

FAIR USE NOTICE

National Security Notice via Washington's Blog:

We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government. We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement. We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. [Four foreign countries also represented here at DTD]. We love the U.S. We don't seek to destroy or attack America ... we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect. We don't support or like Al Qaeda, the Taliban or any supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting. The nation's top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans. Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American ... and undermining America's national security.

Monday, February 19, 2018

The Role of the Media: Whatever Happened to Investigative Journalists?

The Role of the Media:
Whatever Happened to Investigative Journalists?

Media complicity in suppressing the evidence related to 9/11 is arguably the greatest barrier to exposing what happened that day.

Fran Shure, M.A., L.P.C., co-founder of Colorado 9/11 Truth, has written a series of articles for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth) entitled Why Do Good People Become Silent – or Worse – About 9/11?  

Click on the title below to read her latest installment (Part 21), The Role of the Media: Act I - Whatever Happened to Investigative Journalists? as it appears on the AE911Truth website. 


The Role of the Media: Act I – Whatever Happened to Investigative Journalists? 

All 20 of her earlier articles may also be found on the AE911Truth website, including Part 20: Those Who Lack Conscience and Empathy: The True Sociopaths.  All segments are a synthesis of academic research and clinical observations.

Could Foreign Terrorists Have Been Responsible for Planting Bombs in the WTC Buildings That Collapsed on 9/11?


Mike Mckay
Sadly, whilst I don't believe the "official conspiracy theory" that uneducated goat fuckers who lived in caves learnt to fly passenger liners by flying completely different types of planes and playing computer simulators or that every security agency on earth magically failed at the exact same time and THEN every defence organisation in the US just happened to be busy doing something else, inept or crippled by neither the president or vice president being reachable by phone

BUT, I don't think any definitive truth will surface in the lifetime of anyone currently living today if ever

The level of the people involved in such a crime would make it quite possible that it could never ever surface either due to dedication to "the cause" or by cut outs killing off loose ends


My Reply:

First off, know that I wrote several of the FAQs and an article for ae911truth...

http://911truthactivism.blogspot.com/2014/07/our-published-work-on-other-sites.html

The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help. HELP is the key word though. The Al-Qaeda terrorists were not "uneducated goat fuckers." To the contrary, they were highly-educated and many in the field of engineering! 
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/14/opinion/the-madrassa-myth.html http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/12/magazine/12FOB-IdeaLab-t.html

This isn't pointed out enough, but physicist Crockett Grabbe, who has many technical articles featured at ae911truth, does not rule out foreign terrorists being responsible for bombs in the building... 
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/mempages/Grabbe.html
http://www2.ae911truth.org/techarts.php

William Rodriguez is famous for two reasons as it pertains to 9/11...

"Most folks know that William Rodriguez is the 9/11 hero who saved hundreds of lives, the last person to escape alive from the World Trade Center before they collapsed...

At the closed-door 9/11 Commission hearing, Rodriguez testified under oath that explosions were going off in the basement of the North Tower before the first plane impacted the building."
https://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/last-man-out-on-911-makes-shocking-disclosures/

But something else he revealed, that also is not illuminated enough, is quite interesting when juxtaposed with what I pointed out about Crockett Grabbe...

"WASHINGTON - A hero janitor who helped victims escape from the World Trade Center's north tower before it collapsed told the 9/11 panel that he came across one of the hijackers in the building a few months before the attack. William Rodriguez, 43, of Jersey City met with the commission for the first time last week. A 20-year Trade Center employee who swept stairwells, he swears he saw United Airlines Flight 175 hijacker Mohand Alshehri in June 2001 and told an FBI agent in the family center at Ground Zero about it a month after the attacks. He never heard back from the bureau. Rodriguez said he was working overtime one weekend cleaning rest rooms on the concourse and mezzanine levels when Alshehri approached him. "I had just finished cleaning the bathroom and this guy asks me, 'Excuse me, how many public bathrooms are in this area?"
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/janitor-tells-9-11-panel-brush-wtc-thug-article-1.647085

These dots when connected suggest there may have been a much more active role in the controlled demolition by foreign terrorists than most 9/11 truthers would have you believe. Of course this would imply inside help, for example, from the security at the WTC and possibly those who conducted the fireproofing upgrades in the WTC towers that strangely correspond to the the floors of impact, fire and failure...
http://911blogger.com/node/13272

Many people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved. More info: http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2014/10/permanent-top-post-by-jm-talboo-and.html



Related:

FAQ #7 – Sounds of Explosions:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/11/faq-7-sounds-of-explosions.html

"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Full version:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2013/10/september-11-new-pearl-harbor-full.html

Debunking the Debunkers: 9/11 Controlled Demolition