Wednesday, December 31, 7000

Permanent Top Post by JM Talboo and Steve W.

By JM Talboo and Steve W. people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth Debunkers.


The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help.

“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States” - 
Former Sen. Bob Graham on 60-Minutes 

We might be wrong about where we suspect this all leads, but the "debunkers" are wrong when many essentially argue that it's acceptable for 70% of 9/11 family members questions to have never been answered by the 9/11 Commission. So of course, most have no qualms about promises made to 9/11 family members being broken by the Commission to investigate all whistleblower claims, which a substantial amount of the public find highly-suspicious at minimum, with many regarding the evidence as suggestive of complicity to varied degrees.

The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.

[On the left side (above) is a video of WTC 7 collapsing. On the right side is a video of a controlled demolition.]

And it stands to reason, that these ilk feel the lack of air defense story is above scrutiny to the point that secrecy and rewards are warranted. So what if this tale consists of 3, or some contend 4, mutually contradictory versions of events and admitted lies. It makes perfect sense that the top officials from NORAD and the FAA received promotions, as opposed to having to provide documents with data that would prove that the jet fighters were acceptably responsive, given the past response time averages.

Unsurprisingly, they hate even the best of the "Loose Change" films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

It is therefore the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth 'Debunkers' and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public.

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here. Ad hominems will be ignored, but well-formed rebuttals may be addressed (and that is a subjective matter) provided we have not refuted the points therein numerous times on this blog already.


National Security Notice via Washington's Blog:

We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government. We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement. We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. [Four foreign countries also represented here at DTD]. We love the U.S. We don't seek to destroy or attack America ... we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect. We don't support or like Al Qaeda, the Taliban or any supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting. The nation's top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans. Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American ... and undermining America's national security.

Saturday, February 25, 2017


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                       

     Maybe like some of you, I have gotten to know myself better over the past several months. I have always considered myself anything but conservative. “Beyond liberal,” I have said when describing my basic orientation:  meaning liberal, only more so compared to the range of holes provided on a standard belt. Sort of a lone sentinel, out there when it came to equality, fairness, generosity, universal enablement, foolhardiness or moxie.
     But then, people (the media, mostly) started referring to arch-globalist and militarist, mealy-mouthed, wicked old grandmotherly chiseler Hillary Clinton and her wacko, selectively-hateful, spoiled followers as “liberals”, and my idealist vocabulary started to curdle, fast. Because, all these schmucks the media calls “liberals” and even “leftists” are about as liberal as a toad. Liberalism is not boneheaded borderless-ness. Nor is it defamation and shrieking “treason” through your tears and trashing the Constitution’s election ground rules agreed on by all at the start because you didn’t win the race.
     Being, I feel, a true progressive, I cannot support all of President Trump’s by now apparent policies, on conservation and the environment, for example. But, he won my cautious allegiance all the same, when he came out squarely against globalist trade policy and dictation, spineless outsourcing of everything tangible, regime-change wars (though he’s still way more warlike than I would like), following through on what you say you’re going to do, fixing our broken infrastructure with our labor, and, I believe, exposing and going after pedophiles and the silent thieves in suits infesting our fetid swamps. In sum, I hate the transparent lies, ruthlessness, and arrogance of the controlled media and the manipulators just as much as Trump does.
     In fact, I’ve come to the shocking realization that Trump’s particular set of conservative values are my conservative values, just as much as FDR’s liberal values are also mine.
     I am absolutely paranoid for him: the whole filthy establishment is out to erase him and his born-again virtue and by now quite obvious resolve and ability to right the wrongs that are oppressing and enslaving us so that powerful criminals may prosper off of us (whatever he may have been in his still-murky past life) from the earth. And, you know, maybe it would take someone like him, brash, independent, outspoken and plainspoken, and none too cautious, to do what we’ve elected him to do. Can he do no wrong? Hardly.
     But, here’s hoping he will be of a mind to finally strip bare and prosecute the reality of 9/11, let the chips fall and stack up and not be scurried off like the myriad still-half-molten steel beams fallen amongst the still-all-but-breathing dust. We have clues of that, according to some. But, only clues.
     So, no wonder there have been no more flagrant “false flags” in this country in the months since his election. Full stop. Period. Did anyone notice?

JH: 2/24/17       

Friday, February 24, 2017

Donald Trump Warns Of Deep State and Conflict With Russia

In this video, we go over the 2 most shocking revelations coming from Donald Trump's impromptu press conference where the U.S President did not hold back anything back. We cover the revelations from the leaks inside the White House and Donald Trump warning people about the push for conflict taking place now with Vladimir Putin of Russia.

There is a clear difference between what Trump wants to do and what the Deep State wants him to do. Trump still has some sway over the people he appoints so there is still some level of hope that the ship can be turned around. The President cannot change things without help, which is why more damning Pizzagate-type leaks are needed. 

We have this thing called the Internet and is MUST be used to get the information out that would upend the existing corrupt system (nods to Anonymous, Wikileaks, and those of good conscience within the Intelligence Community). 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 24th, 2017.]

A witness describes Andrew Breitbart's final moments

sounds like cyanide poisoning,,, the mafia hit man called ice man tells ab how he would bump up against someone in a bar and poison them with cyanide and no one would suspect a thing,,,go watch what he says about what happens ,,,he said they just gurgle and fall asleep just like this man described,,,no one just drops dead out of the blue,,,the coroner also dropped dead after examining the body,,,probably bc it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that its cyanide that killed him

The coroner that did Breitbart's autopsy was also murdered with arsenic soon after.

Andrew Breitbart on Divide & Conquer, Race... by debunkerbuster